If you’re not new to this blog, or not new to my other writings, you know well my opinion, based on statistical dating and lay tracking, regarding women over the age of 30. Specifically, women over the age of 33. In my experience, women over the age of 33, in general (yes, there are always odd exceptions) are harder to lay, take longer to lay, have more ASD, are more demanding, and are more work in dating or relationships. Most men in the seduction community (as well as normal AFCs outside of the community) have also found this to be true (even if they are reluctant to admit it).
Yes, there are a few men who have made a career out of quickly and easily fucking women over 30. But these are always guys are very good at positioning themselves to older women as good-looking, fun, younger guys with no money and zero provider potential. It works for them, and that’s great. But that will never work for me and most other guys out there. (Most guys have a stable income and don’t wish to hide it, most guys are not good-looking, and a hell of a lot of guys are not young.) Moreover, even these guys run into the demanding work older women require once they actually get into a relationship with one of these cougars.
In my own experience, based on my game, my system, and who I am, generally speaking, the younger the woman, the harder it is to get her out on a first date, but the easier it is to lay her once that first date occurs.
In other words, I can fill my entire calendar, every day for the next three months, with women age 35 to 45 easily and instantly without breaking a sweat. I but I would simply kill myself will all of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, (and beyond!) dates I would have to have (and pay for) to actually lay these high-maintenance, ASD-ridden gals. On the other hand, it’s hard to get 18 and 19 year-olds to gather enough courage and overcome their laziness and disorganization to actually meet me in real life, but when I do, my fast lay ratios with these gals are insane.
Honestly, even at my age (38) I think there’s only been a grand total of two 18 or 19 year-olds I met via online dating who I didn’t have sex with. Once I get them in front of me, which can be difficult, a lay is in the bag. Exactly the opposite of the over 30 women.
So because of all this, you know that in terms of sarging and seduction, I avoid women over age 33 like the plague, unless I already know them in my social circle. (In which case they’re as easy to lay as anyone else. The fact they already know you short-circuits most of their ASD and “dating rules”.)
Due to some events last year, and some recent events with my latest online dating surge, some of which I have posted about on this blog, I am now dropping my maximum age of 33 down to 29. As of approximately two weeks ago, I will no longer open women over the age of 29. I’m sticking with women age 18 to 29, and that’s it. (Again, unless a 30+ I already know comes to me with sexual desire, which does occasionally happen. Then I’ll be happy to be of service.)
What this means in terms of my ratios is that it will now be (a little) harder to get first dates, but my first dates-to-lays ratios will increase, yet again. In terms of online dating, this means I will have to send out more openers, but will have to go on less first dates to get the same number of lays. Which is exactly what I want. Sending out email openers is easy and fast (and now that I use macros, very fast). But first dates that don’t result in a lay are truly a waste of time, energy, money, and gas.
I probably should have done this a while ago. And who knows? In the future, I may even drop that 29 down to 27 or 26, further raising my need for openers but reducing my first date requirements. So far though, 26-29 year-olds don’t give me near the hassle that 30+ women do, though women 25 and under are easier.
It’s a sad reality that for every year a woman ages, society adds a little more ASD to her brain.
…not that I’m complaining about all the younger women in my life.